Compliance by construction

Controls sit in the execution path, not beside it.

YembiPay combines scoped tenant authority, sanctions and AML evidence, bounded public verification, and an append-only audit trail without claiming that software replaces legal or regulatory judgment.

Control layers

Defense in depth across identity, policy, execution, and evidence.

Every control has an authority, a failure state, a traceable decision, and a testable boundary.

01

Tenant isolation

Organization identity comes from the API-key context; caller-supplied organization IDs are claims that must match.

02

Sanctions evidence

Dataset generation, match evidence, policy version, and decision outcome bind to the screened subject.

03

AML monitoring

Velocity, amount, corridor, and behavioral controls produce reviewable events without logging sensitive raw data.

04

Audit and proof

Mutations and terminal outcomes preserve actor, object, request, timestamp, and integrity references.

Data discipline

Collect less. Expose less. Retain with purpose.

Public verification returns minimum necessary facts. Webhook secrets appear once. Logs keep request and security decisions while excluding credentials and sensitive recipient data.

Compliance outcomes are evidence-backed product states, not blanket regulatory guarantees.

Scope statement

Assurance path

Make every claim independently reviewable.

Architecture, code, migrations, CI, external tests, live-host verification, and contract audits each prove a different part of the control environment.

01

Prevent

Scope, ownership, validation, and fail-closed configuration stop invalid work.

Runtime
02

Detect

Structured, redacted security events and bounded health signals expose failures.

Observe
03

Recover

Durable cursors, idempotency, and reconciliation prevent blind replay.

Resume
04

Prove

Blocking tests and exported evidence make the posture reviewable.

Audit